skip to main content
10.1145/2674005.2675016acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing and Boosting the Performance of Power-Line Communication Networks

Published:02 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Power-line communications are employed in home networking to provide easy and high-throughput connectivity. IEEE 1901, the MAC protocol for power-line networks, employs a CSMA/CA protocol similar to that of 802.11, but is substantially more complex, which probably explains why little is known about its performance. One of the key differences between the two protocols is that whereas 802.11 only reacts upon collisions, 1901 also reacts upon several consecutive transmissions and thus can potentially achieve better performance by avoiding unnecessary collisions.

In this paper, we propose a model for the 1901 MAC. Our analysis reveals that the default configuration of 1901 does not fully exploit its potential and that its performance degrades with the number of stations. We derive analytically the optimal configuration parameters for 1901; this drastically improves throughput and achieves optimal performance without requiring the knowledge of the number of stations in the network. In contrast, to provide a similar performance, 802.11 requires knowing the number of contending stations, which is unfeasible for realistic traffic patterns. Our solution can be readily implemented by vendors, as it only consists in modifying existing MAC parameters. We corroborate our results with testbed measurements, unveiling a significant signaling overhead in 1901 implementations.

References

  1. Atheros Open Powerline Toolkit.https://github.com/qca/open-plc-utils.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Faifa. http://github.com/ffainelli/faifa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. HomePlug Alliance (retrieved 9/2014). www.homeplug.org/media/filer_public/e4/cb/e4cbfc97--5e5e-4df1--9625-c226df16c93f/connected_home_summits_2013.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. HomePlug Alliance (retrieved 9/2014). www.homeplug.org/news-events/member-pr/358/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. IEEE 802.11n-2009-Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. OpenWrt. https://openwrt.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IEEE Standard for Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications. IEEE Std 1901--2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Bianchi. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Bianchi, L. Fratta, and M. Oliveri. Performance evaluation and enhancement of the CSMA/CA MAC protocol for 802.11 wireless LANs. In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 1996. PIMRC'96., Seventh IEEE International Symposium on.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. E. M. Campista, L. Costa, and O. Duarte. Improving the multiple access method of CSMA/CA home networks. In Proc. CCNC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Cano and D. Malone. On Efficiency and Validity of Previous Homeplug MAC Performance Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.6803, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Chung, M. Jung, T. Lee, and Y. Lee. Performance analysis of HomePlug 1.0 MAC with CSMA/CA. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 24(7):1411--1420, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. E. Kriminger and H. Latchman. Markov chain model of homeplug CSMA MAC for determining optimal fixed contention window size. In Power Line Communications and Its Applications (ISPLC), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Kumar, E. Altman, D. Miorandi, and M. Goyal. New Insights From a Fixed-Point Analysis of Single Cell IEEE 802.11 WLANs. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, june 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Lee, R. E. Newman, H. A. Latchman, S. Katar, and L. Yonge. HomePlug 1.0 powerline communication LANs-protocol description and performance results. International Journal of Communication Systems, 16(5):447--473, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. P. Patras, A. Banchs, P. Serrano, and A. Azcorra. A control-theoretic approach to distributed optimal configuration of 802.11 WLANs. Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 10(6):897--910, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Schwager. An Overview of the HomePlug AV2 Technology. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Serrano, P. Patras, A. Mannocci, V. Mancuso, and A. Banchs. Control theoretic optimization of 802.11 wlans: Implementation and experimental evaluation. Computer Networks, 57(1):258--272, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Vlachou, A. Banchs, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. On the MAC for Power-Line Communications: Modeling Assumptions and Performance Tradeoffs. In IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Vlachou, A. Banchs, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. Performance Analysis of MAC for Power-line Communications. In ACM Sigmetrics, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Vlachou, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. Fairness of MAC protocols: IEEE 1901 vs. 802.11. In 2013 17th IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. Vlachou, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. Simulator and Experimental Framework for the MAC of Power-Line Communications. Infoscience EPFL, Technical Report, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing and Boosting the Performance of Power-Line Communication Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CoNEXT '14: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies
          December 2014
          438 pages
          ISBN:9781450332798
          DOI:10.1145/2674005

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 December 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CoNEXT '14 Paper Acceptance Rate27of133submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate198of789submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader