skip to main content
10.1145/2815675.2815689acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Electri-Fi Your Data: Measuring and Combining Power-Line Communications with WiFi

Published:28 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Power-line communication (PLC) is widely used as it offers high data-rates and forms a network over electrical wiring, an existing and ubiquitous infrastructure. PLC is increasingly being deployed in hybrid networks that combine multiple technologies, the most popular among which is WiFi. However, so far, it is not clear to which extent PLC can boost network performance or how hybrid implementations can exploit to the fullest this technology. We compare the spatial and temporal variations of WiFi and PLC.

Despite the potential of PLC and its vast deployment in commercial products, little is known about its performance. To route or load balance traffic in hybrid networks, a solid understanding of PLC and its link metrics is required. We conduct experiments in a testbed of more than 140 links. We introduce link metrics that are crucial for studying PLC and that are required for quality-aware algorithms by recent standardizations of hybrid networks. We explore the spatial and temporal variation of PLC channels, showing that they are highly asymmetric and that link quality and link-metric temporal variability are strongly correlated. Based on our variation study, we propose and validate a capacity estimation technique via a metric that only uses the frame header. We also focus on retransmissions due to channel errors or to contention, a metric related to delay, and examine the sensitivity of metrics to background traffic. Our performance evaluation provides insight into the implementation of hybrid networks; we ease the intricacies of understanding the performance characteristics of the PHY and MAC layers.

References

  1. HomePlug Alliance. http://www.homeplug.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IEEE 1905.1--2013 Std for a Convergent Digital Home Network for Heterogeneous Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. IEEE 802.11n-2009-Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. OpenWrt. http://https://openwrt.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Qualcomm Atheros Open Powerline Toolkit. https://github.com/qca/open-plc-utils.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IEEE Standard for Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications. IEEE Std 1901--2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. M. Das, H. Pucha, K. Papagiannaki, and Y. C. Hu. Studying wireless routing link metric dynamics. In Proc. of the 7th ACM Conf. on Internet measurement, pages 327--332, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Draves, J. Padhye, and B. Zill. Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom, 2004, pages 114--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Guzelgoz, H. B. Celebi, T. Guzel, H. Arslan, and M. K. Mıhçak. Time frequency analysis of noise generated by electrical loads in PLC. In 17th International Conf. on Telecommunications (ICT), pages 864--871. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, and M. F. Kaashoek. The Click modular router. ACM TOCS, 18(3):263--297, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y.-J. Lin, H. A. Latchman, R. E. Newman, and S. Katar. A comparative performance study of wireless and power line networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 41(4):54--63, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Z. Liu, A. El Fawal, and J.-Y. Le Boudec. Coexistence of multiple homeplug av logical networks: A measurement based study. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf. (GLOBECOM), 2011, pages 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Murty, J. Padhye, R. Chandra, A. R. Chowdhury, and M. Welsh. Characterizing the end-to-end performance of indoor powerline networks. Technical report, Harvard University Microsoft Research Technical Report, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Papagiannaki, M. D. Yarvis, and W. S. Conner. Experimental characterization of home wireless networks and design implications. In IEEE INFOCOM 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Sancha, F. Canete, L. Diez, and J. Entrambasaguas. A channel simulator for indoor power-line communications. In IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications (ISPLC), pages 104--109, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. K. Sheshadri and D. Koutsonikolas. Comparison of routing metrics in 802.11n wireless mesh networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2013, pages 1869--1877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Tinnakornsrisuphap, P. Purkayastha, and B. Mohanty. Coverage and capacity analysis of hybrid home networks. In IEEE International Conf. on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2014, pages 117--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. C. Vlachou, A. Banchs, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. Analyzing and boosting the performance of power-line communication networks. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, pages 1--12. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Vlachou, A. Banchs, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. On the MAC for Power-Line Communications: Modeling Assumptions and Performance Tradeoffs. In IEEE International Conf. on Network Protocols (ICNP), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Vlachou, S. Henri, and P. Thiran. Electri-Fi Your Data: Measuring and Combining Power-Line Communications with WiFi (Technical Report 210617). Infoscience EPFL 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Vlachou, J. Herzen, and P. Thiran. Fairness of MAC protocols: IEEE 1901 vs. 802.11. In Proc. of IEEE ISPLC 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. Zarikoff and D. Malone. Construction of a PLCmboxtestbed for network and transport layer experiments. In Proc. of IEEE ISPLC 2011, pages 135--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Electri-Fi Your Data: Measuring and Combining Power-Line Communications with WiFi

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference
      October 2015
      550 pages
      ISBN:9781450338486
      DOI:10.1145/2815675

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IMC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate31of96submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      IMC '24
      ACM Internet Measurement Conference
      November 4 - 6, 2024
      Madrid , AA , Spain

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader